There’s a version of you, maybe the one reading this right now, that is always nice. You’re thoughtful. Empathic. Accommodating. You know how to keep the peace. You say yes when you want to say no. You laugh at jokes that make your skin crawl. You nod at opinions that hollow you out.
You’ve become a master of emotional editing. And you’ve been praised for it. But you know that your niceness is a mask. A beautiful, suffocating mask you learned to wear because somewhere along the way, you decided that rage was dangerous, but being liked was safe.
Let’s be precise.
Niceness is not the same as kindness. Kindness is rooted in strength. It’s the generosity of someone who could dominate, but doesn’t. Niceness is fear in costume. It’s an avoidance strategy.
You’re not saying yes because you mean it. You’re saying yes because you’re afraid of what will happen if you say no. You’re not staying quiet because you’re wise. You’re staying quiet because you’re terrified of being disliked, misunderstood, or abandoned.
Niceness doesn’t come from love. It comes from early psychological survival tactics, from needing to manage other people’s emotions because your nervous system couldn’t afford their chaos.
So you became the container. The sponge. The emotional shock absorber. You learned that rage was inconvenient. That your boundaries made people angry. That showing too much was labelled as ‘’dramatic’’. And so you cut parts of yourself off. You amputated your edges. You shrank into someone palatable. They called it “maturity” and you said ‘’thank you’’.
But in reality, rage is not the problem. Repressed rage is. Unacknowledged rage leaks out. In passive aggressive texts. In relationships where you secretly punish people for not reading your mind. In autoimmune illness. In manipulation. With exhaustion. With anxiety. With emotional numbness that no amount of yoga or journaling seems to fix.
You don’t need another affirmation. You need to scream. You need to write the unsent letter. You need to punch the floor. You need to remember what it feels like to have a boundary. To have a holy NO.
Rage, when faced consciously, is not violence. It’s clarity and it’s a gift. Rage is the psyche’s alarm bell when you’ve tolerated too much, for too long, and are now betraying yourself in real-time. It’s what happens when your boundaries have been neglected, by others and especially by you.
And yes, rage can destroy.
But what no one tells you is that you can use the fire that destroys you to also warm your hands.
What I fully believe is that you can’t really be good until you’re powerful. Yeah, Zimbardo, the Stanford Prison Experiment, the whole “Myth of Harmlessness” thing. It was the ‘’normal’’ people who turned cruel because they believed they were on the side of order, of good behavior, of rule-following. Proof of how quickly people conform to roles. They weren’t monsters. They were nice guys playing authority. And it’s always the “nice guys” who become the most terrifying when given the right mask, a little power, and a moral excuse.
I say this because people who believe they’re morally innocent are the least aware of their own capacity for harm. Your “niceness” means nothing until you’ve faced the part of you that could just as easily control, gaslight, punish, or betray. It means nothing until you’ve stood in front of your rage and said: ‘’I know you’’.
That’s when kindness begins to matter. Because now it’s not performative. It’s chosen. You are no longer good because you’re afraid to be bad. You’re good because you’ve chosen to carry your shadow with integrity.
Tell me what real adulthood is like without telling me what real adulthood is like. I will go first. You have the capacity to feel everything without becoming a slave to it.
Interesting reflection. Learning empathy through experience in general can be very powerful - but the difference between becoming harmful in response or not, as a person, is still a bit of a mystery to me. I genuinely don’t know where good will comes from.
One rub - You mention the SEP - one thing that comes to mind: that involved group dynamics, and a situation where maintaining behavior neutrality (much less innate, naive “niceness”) is really impossible - the collective will of the group grew like an organism. But a lot of what you write about can also (even primarily) manifest in isolation, and even by design. (One of the first things that an abusive person will often do is start to dislocate the victim from a larger social group, isolate from friends/family, for example). This isn’t to disagree with anything above - only to suggest that a key context has to do with the nature of the interpersonal (eg intimate partner), and how that relates back to larger, more casual social interactions (eg work acquaintances).
Also, I think your point about the difference between nice and kind should be taught in every middle school curriculum - so important.
THANK YOU!!! this is exactly what i've been pondering when i think anger is such a weaponized emotion in media and culture. wonderful writing